Chapter 1 - Introduction
1.3. Guidance
The following definitions offer guidance for interpreting policy statements found in the GDOT Design Policy Manual:
May – The use of the word “may”
indicates a permissive condition. Under this condition, the designer
is encouraged to make a reasonable effort to follow the appropriate
design criteria. In those instances where it is impractical to follow
appropriate design criteria, the designer should use sound engineering
judgment; no further GDOT authorization is required.
Shall/Will – The use of the words “shall”
and “will” designates a mandatory condition and the designer
must make every practical effort to follow the appropriate design criteria.
In those instances where it is impractical to follow the appropriate
design criteria, it will be necessary to request a Design Exception
or Design Variance from the GDOT Chief Engineer.
Should – The use of the word “should”
indicates an advisory condition. Under this condition, it is recommended,
although not mandatory, that the designer follow the appropriate design
criteria. In those instances where it is impractical to follow appropriate
design criteria, the project manager shall receive approval from the
appropriate Office Head. Acceptable documentation may be in the form
of an email, letter to file, or meeting minutes. The project manager
shall document the decision and approval in the Project Design Data
Book. The criteria for the Project Design Data Book can be found in
the GDOT
Plan Development Process (PDP).
GDOT
Design Policy Manual ver. 2.0 Revised 11/17/2008