Georgia Department of Transportation
Purpose | How to Use this Manual
Brief History | Guiding Principles
Decision-Making | Community | Sensitivity | Design | Solutions
Project Index | Georgia Projects | Projects Nationwide
References | CSS Links | Publications | Appendices | Glossary
Table of Contents | Download Manual

Section 2.
Putting CSS Into Practice

“Good things happen when you pay attention.”
John F. Smith

 

Identifying community values can commonly be addressed through a Community Impact Assessment (CIA).  A CIA is the process that evaluates the potential impacts of proposed transportation projects on a local community and its sub-populations throughout the transportation decision-making process. The goal of CIA is to focus on the quality of life of the community.   An overview of GDOT policy and procedures for a CIA can be found in the GDOTEnvironmental Procedures Manual, Section 5.0 Community Impact Assessment.

 

Topics that commonly fall under a CIA include: access, mobility, connectivity, social isolation/splitting of neighborhoods, history of the community, new development impacts, changes in the quality of life, changes in neighborhood identification, changes in property values, separation of the neighborhood from community facilities, displacements, impacts on community centers of activity whether formal or informal, noise, urban renewal, removal of urban blight, joint land use, and disruption of the natural and human environment.

 

A CSS project will strike a balance between tradition design values and community values:

 

Table 2.1
Design Values vs. Community Values

Traditional Design Values                          

  • Safety
  • Efficiency
  • Traffic Operations / Capacity
  • Constructability
  • Maintenance
  • Access Management

Community Values

  • Social & Cultural Compatibility
  • Environmental Sensitivity / Impacts
  • Livability, Aesthetics, Urban Design, Historic
  • Economic Impacts/Enhancements
  • Mobility / Transportation Needs

 

Table 2.2 lists a number of stakeholders who can assist the project team with identifying values that are held in highest regard by a community:

 

Table 2.2
Stakeholder Resources
for Identifying Community Values

Social and Cultural Compatibility

Local & Regional Planning

Civic Organizations

Residential Community

Recreational Groups

Business Groups

Environmental Sensitivity/Impacts

Environmental Community:

Environmental Interest Groups

Dept. of Natural Resources

NPS/US Forest Service

Watershed Districts

Livability / Aesthetics / Urban Design

Civic Organizations

City/County Planning

Redevelopment Authority

Historic Preservation Society

Residential Community and/or
Business Community, depending upon context

Economic Impacts / Enhancements

City/County Planning

Redevelopment Authority

Chambers of Commerce

Business Community

Ports Authority

Tourist Industry

Transportation Needs / Mobility

 Local Transit Providers

City/County Public Works

City/County Planning Agency

Facility Users/ Area Traffic Generators

Source: Adapted from FHWA, Road Best Traveled Report - Resources for Identifying Context (Zimmerman, 2001)

 

< Prev     Top     Next >


This page was last updated on April 23, 2006 9:38 PM

logo Home | Resources | Access | Contact | ©2006 GDOT